08-10-2013 12:23 PM
For QTP 11 install patch QTPWeb_00124.
For QTP 11.5, update 2 registry settings:
[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Mercury Interactive\QuickTest Professional\MicTest\Packages\WebPackage\Settings] set "IgnoreSpecialBlankPage" entry value to 1.
[HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Mercury Interactive\QuickTest Professional\MicTest\Packages\WebPackage\Settings] set "IgnoreSpecialBlankPage" entry value to 1.
11-13-2013 10:28 AM
I am using QTP 11 will all the patches and IE8. Have the same issue.
Sometime the run passes and sometimes it fail to recongnize the object. Tried to clear Cache, Cookies etc but still its not running consistently.
I am sure its a minor setting somewhere. I would appreciate if anybody can help.
11-14-2013 06:43 AM
The critical part is this: Does it never recognize an object, or does it recognize it sometimes and not others? If you run the same test with the same data five times, for example, does it pass three times and fail twice, for instance.
A subpart of that second scenario is will it run fine from UFT/QTP but then fail sometimes when the test is kicked off from QC.
If it never recognized the object, then look at the response above.
But if it is a "sometimes" problem, welcome to the club.
The problem seems to be the page not being ready in ways that "sync" doesn't know about. I have had to put in loops at critical points where I check to see if a particular object exists or is visible or whatever, and then move ahead when it is. Sometimes what I am checking is the object I want to use, other times -- like after a "click" -- I am testing to see if the result of the click succeeded, then looping back and clicking again until it works.
12-18-2013 09:57 PM
I am using QTP11, I faced a new kind of issue as, When i spy wed edit in IE7-> It spy's correct. But when I spy the same web edit using IE8-> The properties all changed. It doesnt consider as web edit and takes as win object.
Can any one pls help me out here.
01-07-2014 05:52 AM
I am also facing a issue in which While Running the PEGA application QTP11 is unable to indentify the object in WINDOWS 7 mahcine at client side, but using Object SPY i m able to see the OBJECT CLASS name and all details.
While the same is working in XP and one of my LAptop.
01-29-2014 04:31 AM - edited 01-29-2014 04:34 AM
I am also facing a issue in which While Running the PEGA(DELPHI) application QTP11 is unable to indentify the object in WINDOWS 7 machine at client side, but using Object SPY i m able to see the OBJECT CLASS name and all details.
THIS APPLICATION is a WINDOWS BASED
05-31-2014 12:42 AM
I am facing the same issue as on PEGA application with QTP11, at times objects are not recongnized by QTP.
I called up HP support to get the QTPWEB_00124 patch downloaded.
But they say that its not available.
Could you please share the link from where you got this patch?
07-21-2014 05:04 AM
People face problems of Object identification many times. Here are the solutions to overcome it.
1. Check the version of QTP you are using. Then check the versions of IE that supports.
In case if any patch available, download that and get it installed with QTP.
2. Open QTP 1st before opening the Browser.
3. If its happenning in runtime, you can use waitproperty or sync so that the page loads completely and then move to the next operations.
For more info, you can view the blog www.qtphelp.com. You can post any questions also. We would be happy to solve your issues.
3 weeks ago
I am using UFT 11.53 and my application is a java application embedded in chrome frame.
UFT identifies the objects only when i disable the chrome frame Add on. But this makes the application very slow.
Can you suggest any other way.
3 weeks ago
Hope you are doing well.
Google Chrome Frame in Embedded Browsers is not supported.
We already have an enhacement requests for it:
Support of Google Chrome Frames objects on embedded browser controls for IE: QCCR1J29755
Chrome embedded browser process (Enhancement Request: QCCR1J25379)
Embedded Chrome controls (Enhancement Request: QCCR1J26104)
Please mark this answer as accepted solution or correct answer if this answered your question.
[If this post solves or helps solve your issue, mark the thread as solved and give KUDOS to the author for their assistance.]
[Opinions expressed in my postings are mine alone, and do not reflect the opinions of my employer.No warranties express or implied for any solution/suggestion posted.]