- Community Home
- >
- Storage
- >
- Tape
- >
- Tape Backup (Small and Medium Business)
- >
- HP StorageWorks DAT 72 'HP C7438A' +C8010A actua...
turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
HP StorageWorks DAT 72 'HP C7438A' +C8010A actual perfomance
(5064 Views)
Reply
Topic Options
- Subscribe
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic to the Top
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
HP StorageWor ks DAT 72 'HP C7438A' +C8010A actual perfomance
Post options
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
11-07-2007 11:09 PM
System is
System Model : ProLiant DL380 G4
Operating System : Windows Server 2003
Service Pack 2
Symantec Backup Exec 11d for Windows Servers
HP StorageWorks DAT 72 'HP C7438A'
Tape C8010A
more details are attached
C8010A specs says that it can write 11 Gb/hour
With BE I get about 150 Mb/min
But when I test it with HP StorageWorks Library and Tape Tools
perfomance changes dramatically
|__ Device Performance Test Started on Drive (C7438A) (Tape0)
||__ Testing with 2:1 Compression Ratio
||__ Opening Tape Drive Tape0
||__ Rewinding Tape
||__ Writing 1GB of 1GB
||__ 1 GB written in 182 seconds at 5 MB/s
||__ Rewinding Tape
||__ Closing Tape Drive Tape0
|__ Device Performance Test Started on Drive (C7438A) (Tape0)
|__ Testing with Zeros
|__ Opening Tape Drive Tape0
|__ Rewinding Tape
|__ Writing 1GB of 1GB
|__ 1 GB written in 75 seconds at 13 MB/s
|__ Rewinding Tape
|__ Closing Tape Drive Tape0
So, the question is - what's the actual perfomance of those units?
System Model : ProLiant DL380 G4
Operating System : Windows Server 2003
Service Pack 2
Symantec Backup Exec 11d for Windows Servers
HP StorageWorks DAT 72 'HP C7438A'
Tape C8010A
more details are attached
C8010A specs says that it can write 11 Gb/hour
With BE I get about 150 Mb/min
But when I test it with HP StorageWorks Library and Tape Tools
perfomance changes dramatically
|__ Device Performance Test Started on Drive (C7438A) (Tape0)
||__ Testing with 2:1 Compression Ratio
||__ Opening Tape Drive Tape0
||__ Rewinding Tape
||__ Writing 1GB of 1GB
||__ 1 GB written in 182 seconds at 5 MB/s
||__ Rewinding Tape
||__ Closing Tape Drive Tape0
|__ Device Performance Test Started on Drive (C7438A) (Tape0)
|__ Testing with Zeros
|__ Opening Tape Drive Tape0
|__ Rewinding Tape
|__ Writing 1GB of 1GB
|__ 1 GB written in 75 seconds at 13 MB/s
|__ Rewinding Tape
|__ Closing Tape Drive Tape0
So, the question is - what's the actual perfomance of those units?
Re: HP StorageWor ks DAT 72 'HP C7438A' +C8010A actual perfomance
Post options
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
11-08-2007 02:56 AM
Performance is always directly related to the system the drive is attached to. When you are testing with LTT you are writing raw data and the results will be different than what you see when you back up your system. There are so many factors involved. Here is a doc that will assist you in determining what your bottlenecks might be and how to get the most out of what you have.
http://h20000.www2.hp.com/bizsupport/TechSupport/D ocument.jsp?objectID=lpg50460
http://h20000.www2.hp.com/bizsupport/TechSupport/D
"You can't lead the orchestra without turning your back to the crowd"
