12-11-2008 04:55 PM
Resellers always want to sell something that's upgradeable, and then after a few years when you are ready to upgrade it seems like it's cheaper to by a new one, so expansion is not a big deal.
Any recommendations on what model of Integrity is one step higher then the RP7420? Blade Server BL870c and RX6600 go up to 1.6 ghz? Which of these is the cheaper way? What is the least amount of memory you can put in these?
Solved! Go to Solution.
12-11-2008 05:42 PM
Compare the specifications and check which will be suitable for the business improvement.
12-11-2008 05:54 PM
Not that I want to prevent you from buying a new Integrity server but have you thought of trying to use better algorithms to handle your flat file? I.e. put the whole thing in memory? Using hashing and indexes?
12-11-2008 06:29 PM
I am not a programmer. We have a really good one on site who programs with C ++ and other progams.We have source code and he tweaks out the programs that run on the Server 100 times better the the canned version.
The killer is that we purchased new apps that need data from here. So It needs to update and send data to an oracle Server and also get data from that same server. It FTP's Data to a different Windows Data warehouse server, and then there are thos SQL servers are always hitting via NFS (I hate NFS. I set up SAMBA, but can't get the D.B.A.'s to use it... that a whole other story).
Getting the info from this server and a daily basis was not good enough, they all seem to be hitting it at the same time. I wish I could send the info to one location and the let the other go there, but everyone wants the info first and they want it now.
12-11-2008 06:35 PM
That is a better link that I was looking at before. Anyone have any other recommendations on models I can look at?
With both having 8 gig of RAM and 4 CPU's, which one of these is cheaper?
12-11-2008 07:15 PM
These sound like I/O and networking bottlenecks. Make sure you are addressing the right problem(s) when you decide on the configuration of your new server.
12-12-2008 07:23 AM
12-12-2008 07:32 AM
I read the links you put out for me. The rx6600 seemed like overkill. But that sheet mentioned the rx4640.
It looks like it can only has 4 processors max, but 3 of 4 cpu options are much faster at 1.6 GHz and 1.5 GHz then the 1.0 GHz on my current RP7420.
Anyone have anyfeedback? Any disadvantagers?
12-12-2008 10:14 PM
Note comparing GHz is not always a accurate way to compare processors, especially when one is RISC and the other is EPIC.
12-15-2008 12:27 AM
To my experience, Itanium machines are twice as fast a PA-RISC machines. Maybe even faster if it is purely CPU-bound.
And about the choice between blades or standaone systems : If you plan to migrate all your rp7420 to Itanium within a year or two, a blade may be a good choice because you can fill it up.
If you buy a blade now to expand it further within 4 years, it will be investing in old technology, just the situation that you are facing now. So make your choice for what you think you need now.
I think that if you by an rx6600, it will certainly be fast enough. But maybe you can ask HP themselves to check that out for your specific application. Maybe, an rx3600 is already sufficient (only 4U instead of 7), but that server has a maximum of 2 processors. Or if space is an issue for you : an rx2660. That system is also a 2-CPU system and takes only 2U.
The price difference between rx6600 and rx2660 is significant, and you can set 3 rx2660 systems in the place of one rx6600, but then you need to be sure these 2 Itanium processors are going to give better performance than the 4 PA-RISC processors.
12-15-2008 04:06 AM
HP has very good support for porting applications from PA-RISC to Itanium rx class systems.
The best path here is to purchase or if possible get on load a rx class server and see about porting your application.
Once this is done you may find this system can replace your rp7420 systems, and even out perform it.
There really is no upgrade path for these beasties, the chasis may be replaceable to an rx74x server (documented above), but the problem remains the app.
Why are we pushing replacement? Because at month end sales of PA-RISC rp class servers end. Its end of the line time and your application needs to move or risk losing hardware support.
You already see the cost of maintenance on these servers is getting high. These costs will continue to climb and then you'll get a drop dead date and be in the land of no support.
Not a good place to be. Work with the developers and plan an exit path.
Owner of ISN Corporation
12-15-2008 08:48 AM
The old 3.1 Basis Pro5 Data base has also ended its life cycle as well, and another Org. is in planning on migrating it to BBj. If this works out for them we will follow suit.
If it does not work as planned. We will purchase a couple of more Processors I will plan to upgrade in two steps. First (The beginning of the year) I will upgrade the O.S. to 11.23 on the Current hardware.
While thats going on, we can begin to budget go Itanium. Around that time the Maint on the other RP7420's running Oracle RAC will be falling out too. And we can then begin to migrate those too.