Re: SAN X1000 vs P2000 (812 Views)
Reply
Frequent Advisor
Wayne Henegar
Posts: 44
Registered: ‎01-29-2010
Message 1 of 4 (812 Views)

SAN X1000 vs P2000

I need a 2-3TB SAN solution. What are your experiences with the X1000 design with W2K8 storage server, versus non-storage server solutions. This would need to support a couple of Hyper-V guest, some file shares, etc. Pro's and Con's please.
Please use plain text.
Honored Contributor
Steven Clementi
Posts: 4,424
Registered: ‎07-28-2004
Message 2 of 4 (812 Views)

Re: SAN X1000 vs P2000

The P2000 comes in different flavors.... and is expandable (easily). They would also require various additional components to connect to your servers.

The X1000 can easily expand too by just adding additional storage shelves.

If you want to use with Hyper-V, the only option would be Windows File Sharing for storage connectivity. (Maybe iSCSI too depending on the software installed) Not sure how Hyper-V works and/or if it supports cifs for your datastores.

With the P2000, you can connect via iSCSI, SAS Direct or via Fibre Channel. Lots more options.

I am sure others will add to this as this is not a full list of differences/pros/cons.


Steven
Steven Clementi
HP Master ASE, Storage and Clustering
MCSE (NT 4.0, W2K, W2K3)
VCP (ESX2, Vi3, vSphere4, vSphere5)
RHCE
Please use plain text.
Frequent Advisor
Wayne Henegar
Posts: 44
Registered: ‎01-29-2010
Message 3 of 4 (812 Views)

Re: SAN X1000 vs P2000

Thank you. For clarification, the connection would be iSCSI, two ethernet ports (MPIO I am told is best for the SAN???)
Please use plain text.
Honored Contributor
Johan Guldmyr
Posts: 3,804
Registered: ‎06-14-2009
Message 4 of 4 (812 Views)

Re: SAN X1000 vs P2000

MPIO is indeed very good to have.

The P2000 also has 10GbE iSCSI interfaces.


Click the Kudos Star if this was a good post.
Please use plain text.
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of HP. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation