Re: End user desktop performance testing (232 Views)
Reply
Occasional Contributor
Posts: 7
Registered: ‎07-04-2013
Message 1 of 4 (293 Views)

End user desktop performance testing

Mostly LR is used for server side performance test.

Can LR been used for the end user performance testing for a web based application?  That is to measuring how long does it take for each page fully loaded after a user action:  a click for instance.

Respected Contributor
Posts: 447
Registered: ‎11-25-2011
Message 2 of 4 (268 Views)

Re: End user desktop performance testing

Hi Matt,

 

This link will provide some useful information http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5567634/load-runner-and-browser-client-performance check this out.

 

Regards,

Srihari

Frequent Advisor
Posts: 62
Registered: ‎05-09-2013
Message 3 of 4 (241 Views)

Re: End user desktop performance testing

Hi,

 

So QTP does do the tests inclusive of client side processing time. And when executed through LR will still be using object based interactions and hence is very scalable as compared to options below.

But the flipside is that it requires a machine per vuser (unless you are using VMs / Terminal Services based Load Generators) PLUS it requires QTP licenses on top of the LR protocol license.

 

Given the above, you may also consider Remote Desktop Procol as an alternative. Flip side on RDP is that the scripts will be co-ordinate based and hence prone to sync issues on replay.

 

Other option is Citrix based access of the application, where the objects are slightly more context driven than RDP. Flipside is that Citrix needs to be licensed.

 

Regards,

AJ

Frequent Advisor
Posts: 45
Registered: ‎09-16-2011
Message 4 of 4 (232 Views)

Re: End user desktop performance testing

I think for that is LR the wrong tool.

The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of HP. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.