Re: make_tape_recovery v. pax, tar (11.31, C.7.16.283) (5896 Views)
Reply
Honored Contributor
Steven Schweda
Posts: 9,096
Registered: ‎02-23-2005
Message 1 of 2 (5,935 Views)

make_tape_recovery v. pax, tar (11.31, C.7.16.283)

   I recently had some trouble with Ignite make_tape_recovery on an
rx2600:

rux# uname -a
HP-UX rux B.11.31 U ia64 1678555272 unlimited-user license

   I downloaded ("Receive for Free >>") and installed the latest Ignite
package which I could find:

rux# ignite version -m xml
<iux:iux xmlns:iux="http://hp.com/ignite" level="non">
  <iux:attr name="ignite_rev">C.7.16.283</iux:attr>
  <iux:attr name="io_info_rev">2.2</iux:attr>
  <iux:attr name="cli_rev">2.1</iux:attr>
</iux:iux>

   Initially, I chose "tar" (the default) for the archive format, but
that generated complaints about some names longer than 100 characters.
Not wishing to lose those files, I tried again, specifying "pax", and
when asked, "Do you want to create an archive with ACL enabled?", I made
the mistake of saying "No", which led to a "pax" failure: "/sbin/pax:
illegal option -- A".  Having learned my lesson, I tried again, this
time answering "Yes", at which point I was informed that my "pax" was
out-of date, and that I needed to install PAX-Enh.  The FTP URI provided
for that was useless, but Google and I managed to find that, too (also
"Receive for Free >>").  Sadly, while getting the PAX-Enh kit itself is
easy enough, it seems to demand 'The corequisite
"PHCO_42016.UX-CORE,fa=HP-UX_B.11.31_IA/PA"', and it was not obvious how
to get that without a support agreement, which I lack.  (I assume that
disabling "enforce_dependencies" would be unwise in this case.)

   I suppose that I can try make_tape_recovery again, specifying "cpio"
-- What can't that scheme do? -- but if there were some no-cost way for
a peon like me to get the PHCO_42016 kit, then I'd prefer that.  (Anyone
with good patch access and no scruples can find me at sms at
antinode.info.)

   What's the point to making PAX-Enh easy to get, but not its
prerequisite(s)/corequisite(s)?  Or am I missing something obvious
(again)?

   When VMS finally dies, it'll be sad to lose an OS which for decades
has come with a backup program which can save and restore any file in
its file system.  I'm easily spoiled, I suppose.

Acclaimed Contributor
Dennis Handly
Posts: 25,277
Registered: ‎03-06-2006
Message 2 of 2 (5,896 Views)

Re: make_tape_recovery v. pax, tar (11.31, C.7.16.283)

[ Edited ]

>'The corequisite "PHCO_42016.UX-CORE,fa=HP-UX_B.11.31_IA/PA"',   (I assume that disabling "enforce_dependencies" would be unwise in this case.)

 

It depends on what's in PAX-Enh.

PHCO_42016  11.31 pax(1) cumulative patch 11/08/24

Only the man page and catalog and pax were changed.

 

>What's the point to making PAX-Enh easy to get, but not its prerequisite(s)/corequisite(s)?

 

Hmm, I would have thought that PAX-Enh was made available before the patches were locked down?

And Software Depot already distributes free and purchasable items but HPSC typically only does patches.

The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of HP. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.