Re: Data Protector 6.21 (705 Views)
Reply
Trusted Contributor
Johnc_3
Posts: 156
Registered: ‎07-16-2004
Message 1 of 4 (724 Views)

Data Protector 6.21

Hi,

 

I'm currently testing the upgrade of Data Protector from v6.11 to 6.21.  I've used 6.20 upgrade and then DPWINBDL_00621.EXE to move to the new version.  However, whenever I check the version number I'm shown that I'm still using v6.20.

 

Is this a 'feature' or am I missing something?

 

Thanks,

 

John

------------------
Kudos gratefully accepted - How to assign...
Please use plain text.
Valued Contributor
jruffer
Posts: 160
Registered: ‎06-28-2011
Message 2 of 4 (719 Views)

Re: Data Protector 6.21

Hi John,

 

You can check by using omnicheck -patches

 

If you have <b621> after some of them then everything should be fine.

 

You need to install the latest patches as well, core first, then cell server then the rest.

 

HTH

 

Jeremy

Please use plain text.
Trusted Contributor
Johnc_3
Posts: 156
Registered: ‎07-16-2004
Message 3 of 4 (714 Views)

Re: Data Protector 6.21

Hi Jeremy,

 

Thanks for the help.  Unfortunately it doesn't really answer my question.

 

The patches I now have are (from omnicheck -patches):

 

Patch level         Patch description
===========================================
DPWIN_00619         Core Component
DPWIN_00619         Core of Integrations component
DPWIN_00610         Cell Manager Component
DPWIN_00620         Disk Agent
DPWIN_00622         Media Agent
DPWIN_00611         User Interface
DPWIN_00611         Manager-of-Managers User Interface
DPWIN_00541(b621)   Java User Interface
DPWIN_00617         English Documentation (Guides, Help)
Number of patches found: 9.

 

However, whenever I use the GUI to examine the version of Data Protector it still says 6.20.  Is this correct?

 

TIA,

 

John

------------------
Kudos gratefully accepted - How to assign...
Please use plain text.
Valued Contributor
jruffer
Posts: 160
Registered: ‎06-28-2011
Message 4 of 4 (705 Views)

Re: Data Protector 6.21

Yes, that's correct.  It's because 621 is a patch bundle rather than a distinct version in its own right, I think.

 

 

Jeremy

Please use plain text.
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of HP. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation